1.4 Global perspective on critical commodities: country summaries and demand
This content is being archived
Please be informed that this content is in the process of being archived. Please see our Legacy Publications page for further information.
Recent studies have been undertaken by several countries to identify which commodities are critical for them. The results of these studies, summarised below and in Table 1.4.1, provide a foundation for the assessment of critical commodity resource potential in Australia.
The country studies vary significantly in their objectives, approach and scope, and so their assessments of which commodities are critical differ accordingly. For example the EU and the US studies integrate both supply risk and importance in their assessments, whereas the UK list represents supply risk only. There is nevertheless sufficient commonality in purpose among the studies that a composite list can be compiled which represents a broad (multi-national) perspective on the commodities considered most critical. Table 1.4.1 summarises the critical commodities identified by several countries.
Table 1.4.1 shows that commodities such as iron, aluminium, copper, gold, lead and uranium yield category three overall scores as countries do not consider these commodities to have high risks of supply. Australia’s current and potential resources of these non-critical commodities are sufficient to meet forseeable demand. The purpose of Table 1.4.1 is to identify critical commodities to assess Australia’s resource potential for these commodities. The commodities included in the assessment are shown with an asterisk in Table 1.4.1, and the assessment of Australia’s resource potential for these commodities is summarised in Section 1.5.
United Kingdom1 | EU low C energy2 | European Union4 | United States DoE5 | South Korea7 | Japan8 | Willis and Chapman (2012)9 | This study10 *ranking | Score10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*Commodity included in this study; helium was not ranked in any of the cited studies
|
||||||||
REE | REE | Antimony | Heavy REE | Gallium | Manganese | Beryllium | *REE | 29 |
Tungsten | Tellurium | Beryllium | Tellurium | Indium | Chromium | Gallium | *Gallium | 29 |
Antimony | Gallium | Cobalt | Indium | Lithium | Nickel | Indium | *Indium | 26 |
Bismuth | Indium | Fluorspar | Lithium | Magnesium | Molybdenum | Magnesium | *Tungsten | 23 |
Molybdenum | Niobium | Gallium | Cobalt | Nickel | Cobalt | PGE | *PGE | 22 |
Strontium | Vanadium | Germanium | Gallium | PGE | Vanadium | REE | *Cobalt | 21 |
Mercury | Tin | Graphite | Manganese | REE | Tungsten | Tin | *Niobium | 20 |
Barium | Selenium | Indium | Nickel | Silicon | Indium | Tungsten | Magnesium | 17 |
Graphite | Silver | Magnesium | Light REE | Titanium | Gallium | Antimony | *Molybdenum | 15 |
Beryllium | Molybdenum | Niobium | Magnesium | Tungsten | PGE | Cobalt | *Antimony | 14 |
Germanium | Hafnium | PGE | Vanadium | Zirconium | REE | Germanium | *Lithium | 14 |
Niobium | Nickel | REE | Antimony | Niobium | Manganese | *Vanadium | 13 | |
PGE | Cadmium | Tantalum | US DoD6 | Chromium | Tantalum | Nickel | *Nickel | 13 |
Cobalt | Tungsten | Zinc | Cobalt | Strontium | Niobium | *Tantalum | 13 | |
Thorium | Sustainable tech EU3 | Tin | Manganese | Lithium | Rhenium | *Tellurium | 13 | |
Indium | Tellurium | Iridium | Molybdenum | Antimony | Tantalum | *Chromium | 12 | |
Gallium | Indium | Platinum | Niobium | Titanium | Tellurium | *Manganese | 12 | |
Arsenic | Gallium | Germanium | Selenium | Zinc | *Selenium | 11 | ||
Magnesium | REE | FerroChrome | Thallium | Bismuth | *Titanium | 10 | ||
Tantalum | Lithium | Tungsten | Vanadium | Chromium | *Strontium | 9 | ||
Selenium | Tantalum | Tantalum | Copper | Fluorine | *Graphite | 8 | ||
Cadmium | Palladium | Niobium | Lead | Lead | *Tin | 8 | ||
Lithium | Platinum | Cobalt | Zinc | Lithium | *Germanium | 8 | ||
Vanadium | Ruthenium | Ferro-manganese | Aluminium | Silicon | *Beryllium | 7 | ||
Tin | Germanium | Beryllium | Silver | *Zirconium | 6 | |||
Fluorine | Cobalt | Chromium | Titanium | *Bismuth | 6 | |||
Silver | Titanium | Zirconium | *Fluorine | 6 | ||||
Chromium | Magnesium | Zinc | 5 | |||||
Nickel | *Mercury | 3 | ||||||
Rhenium | *Thorium | 3 | ||||||
Lead | *Arsenic | 3 | ||||||
Diamond | Lead | 3 | ||||||
Manganese | *Barium | 3 | ||||||
Gold | Silver | 2 | ||||||
Uranium | *Cadmium | 2 | ||||||
Zirconium | *Copper | 2 | ||||||
Iron | Aluminium | 2 | ||||||
Titanium | *Rhenium | 1 | ||||||
Aluminium | Gold | 1 | ||||||
Zinc | Uranium | 1 | ||||||
Copper | Diamond | 1 | ||||||
Iron | 1 | |||||||
*Helium |
The most critical commodities are (in order of score shown in final column of Table 1.4.1): rare-earth elements, gallium, indium, platinum-group elements (in particular platinum and palladium), tungsten, niobium, cobalt, lithium, vanadium, nickel, molybdenum, tantalum and chromium. It should be noted that among the rare-earth elements there is considerable variation in criticality with the heavy rare-earth elements at the highest level whereas the light rare-earth elements, scandium and yttrium are less critical.
The assessments of criticality are essentially snapshots current at the time of the assessments, and in most cases do not take into account changes in future demand for the particular commodities. This report identifies possible critical commodities of which Australia has current or potential resources. Table 1.4.2 compares demand in 2006 with projected demand in 2030, for selected critical commodities plus copper, in the emerging technologies sector (European Commission, 2010). In 2006 the demand from emerging technologies generally comprised only a small to moderate fraction of global production (up to factor of 0.4; see column, Indicator 2006). Importantly, projected annual demand in 2030 for gallium, indium, germanium, neodymium, platinum and tantalum all exceed current annual production (European Commission, 2010). Projected demand in 2030 is proportionately lower for silver, cobalt, palladium, titanium and copper than for the former elements. Nevertheless this analysis demonstrates that all of the commodities listed in Table 1.4.2 could experience large to very large growth in demand by 2030.
Raw material | Production 2006 (tonnes) |
Demand from emerging technologies 2006 (tonnes) |
Demand from emerging technologies 2030 (tonnes) |
Indicator1 2006 |
Indicator1 2030 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Gallium | 152 | 28 | 603 | 0.18 | 3.97 |
Indium | 581 | 234 | 1911 | 0.40 | 3.29 |
Germanium | 100 | 28 | 220 | 0.28 | 2.20 |
Neodymium (REE) | 16 800 | 4000 | 27 900 | 0.23 | 1.66 |
Platinum (PGE) | 255 | very small | 345 | 0 | 1.35 |
Tantalum | 1 384 | 551 | 1410 | 0.40 | 1.02 |
Silver | 19 051 | 5 342 | 15 823 | 0.28 | 0.83 |
Cobalt | 62 279 | 12 820 | 26 860 | 0.21 | 0.43 |
Palladium (PGE) | 267 | 23 | 77 | 0.09 | 0.29 |
Titanium | 7 211 0002 | 15 397 | 58 148 | 0.08 | 0.29 |
Copper | 15 093 000 | 1 410 000 | 3 696 070 | 0.09 | 0.24 |